{"id":1287,"date":"2016-06-13T16:20:18","date_gmt":"2016-06-13T16:20:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/?p=1287"},"modified":"2016-06-13T16:20:18","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T16:20:18","slug":"la-doctrina-del-campo-ocupado-y-la-facultad-del-gobierno-de-puerto-rico-para-implementar-soluciones-a-la-situacion-de-insolvencia-de-sus-subdivisiones-politicas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2016\/06\/13\/la-doctrina-del-campo-ocupado-y-la-facultad-del-gobierno-de-puerto-rico-para-implementar-soluciones-a-la-situacion-de-insolvencia-de-sus-subdivisiones-politicas\/","title":{"rendered":"La doctrina del campo ocupado y la facultad del Gobierno de Puerto Rico para implementar soluciones a la situaci\u00f3n de insolvencia de sus subdivisiones pol\u00edticas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El profesor Nieto Mingo comenta los poderes que tiene el Gobierno de Puerto Rico para legislar soluciones al problema de insolvencia de sus subdivisiones pol\u00edticas. Nieto Mingo plantea que\u00a0 se debe aplicar el an\u00e1lisis de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos en <em>Puerto Rico Department of Consumer Affairs\u00a0 v. Isla Petroleum<\/em> para concluir que el Congreso Federal se retir\u00f3 del campo previamente ocupado al enmendar el C\u00f3digo de Quiebras en 1984. De ser as\u00ed, la legislatura de Puerto Rico puede en efecto implementar su propia ley de quiebras.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cita:<\/strong> Jos\u00e9 L. Nieto Mingo, <em>La doctrina del campo ocupado y la facultad del Gobierno de Puerto Rico para implementar soluciones a la situaci\u00f3n de insolvencia de sus subdivisiones pol\u00edticas<\/em>, 85 Rev. Jur. UPR 721 (2016).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/85-Rev.-Jur.-UPR-721-2016.pdf\">Enlace PDF (+)\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jos\u00e9 L. Nieto Mingo, 85 Rev. Jur. UPR 721 (2016).  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54,76],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1287","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-rev-85","7":"category-rev85-num3"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}