{"id":2579,"date":"2017-06-07T19:30:13","date_gmt":"2017-06-07T23:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/?p=2579"},"modified":"2017-06-07T19:30:13","modified_gmt":"2017-06-07T23:30:13","slug":"derecho-procesal-penal-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2017\/06\/07\/derecho-procesal-penal-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Derecho Procesal Penal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\">El profesor Chiesa Aponte analiza y comenta la jurisprudencia emitida por el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico en el termino de 2015-2016, en la materia de Derecho Procesal Penal. El autor analiza las m\u00e1s recientes opiniones de:<em> Pueblo v. P\u00e9rez Santos<\/em>, 2016 TSPR 62, <em>Pueblo v. Rodr\u00edguez<\/em>, 193 DPR 987 (2015), <em>Pueblo v. M\u00e9ndez P\u00e9rez<\/em> 193 DPR 781 (2015), y <em>Pueblo v. Carrero<\/em> 2016 TSPR 24. En su an\u00e1lisis, el Profesor encuentra que son de mayor importancia las opiniones de <em>Pueblo v. P\u00e9rez Santos<\/em> y <em>Pueblo v. Rodr\u00edguez<\/em>. En adici\u00f3n, el Profesor encuentra pertinente comentar sobre algunas sentencias sin opini\u00f3n emitidas por el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico, que contienen votos importantes para la decisi\u00f3n de futuros casos en asuntos importante tales como la doble exposici\u00f3n, limitaciones a los informes preparados por el Ministerio Publico y la irrazonable dilaci\u00f3n de una orden de arresto. Por ultimo, el autor menciona un caso sobre la fianza en apelaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Professor Chiesa Aponte analyses the cases of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico for the past term of 2015-2016, in the area of Criminal Procedure. The author analyses the Court\u2019s most recent cases which are: <em>Pueblo v. P\u00e9rez Santos<\/em>, 2016 TSPR 62, <em>Pueblo v. Rodr\u00edguez<\/em>, 193 DPR 987 (2015), <em>Pueblo v. M\u00e9ndez P\u00e9rez<\/em> 193 DPR 781 (2015), and <em>Pueblo v. Carrero<\/em> 2016 TSPR 24. Professor Chiesa understands that the most important opinions emitted by the Court for this term in respect to Criminal Procedure are <em>Pueblo v. P\u00e9rez Santos<\/em> and <em>Pueblo v. Rodr\u00edguez<\/em>. Additionally, the author finds relevant to analyze other cases that the Puerto Rico Supreme Court resolved without issuing an opinion. These cases contain important votes for future cases regarding the topics of double jeopardy, limitations on the prosecutor&#8217;s expressions on court documents, and unreasonable delay on arrest warrants. Finally, at the end of the article, the author mentions a case about bail on appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Cita:\u00a0<\/strong>Ernesto L. Chiesa Aponte,\u00a0<em>Derecho Procesal Penal<\/em>, 86 Rev. Jur. UPR 538 (2017).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/04.-Decho-Procesal-Penal-86REVJURUPR538.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enlace PDF (+)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ernesto L. Chiesa Aponte, \ufeff86 Rev. Jur. UPR 538 (2017).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2579","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-volumen-86-num-2"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2579\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}