{"id":2634,"date":"2017-06-27T15:17:13","date_gmt":"2017-06-27T19:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/?p=2634"},"modified":"2017-06-27T15:17:13","modified_gmt":"2017-06-27T19:17:13","slug":"analisis-de-jurisprudencia-2015-2016-tribunal-supremo-de-los-estados-unidos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2017\/06\/27\/analisis-de-jurisprudencia-2015-2016-tribunal-supremo-de-los-estados-unidos\/","title":{"rendered":"Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\">El profesor Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s analiza una serie de casos resueltos por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos durante el t\u00e9rmino 2015-2016 en los renglones de Derecho Constitucional, Procedimiento Criminal, Derecho Laboral, Procedimiento Civil, Derecho Administrativo, Derecho Penal, Quiebras y Derechos de Autor. El autor eval\u00faa y critica en parte los casos de <em>Puerto Rico v. S\u00e1nchez Valle <\/em>y <em>Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Fund<\/em>, cuyo efecto denomina como sustancial para la relaci\u00f3n jur\u00eddico-pol\u00edtica entre Puerto Rico y los Estados Unidos, particularmente en el segundo caso. En general, el profesor Farinacci Fern\u00f3s comenta que el t\u00e9rmino 2015-2016 se caracteriz\u00f3 por la resoluci\u00f3n estrecha de los casos que se argumentaron ante el Tribunal Supremo federal, con una tendencia hacia la interpretaci\u00f3n estatutaria textualista, que en ocasiones se combin\u00f3 con importantes herramientas teleol\u00f3gicas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Professor Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s undertakes an analysis of several decisions handed down by the United States Supreme Court during the 2015-2016 term in the fields of Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Labor Law, Civil Procedure, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Bankruptcy and Copyright Law. The author analyzes and criticizes in part the decisions rendered in <em>Puerto Rico v. S\u00e1nchez Valle <\/em>and <em>Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Fund<\/em>, whose effect on legal-political relations between Puerto Rico and the United States he deems as substantial, especially in the second case. Generally speaking, professor Farinacci Fern\u00f3s observes that the 2015-2016 term was characterized by the narrow decision of cases argued before the Court, with a tendency towards textualist statutory interpretation, which on occasion was bolstered with key teleological tools.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Cita:<\/strong> Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s, <em>Jurisprudencia<\/em> <em>del<\/em>\u00a0<em>Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos<\/em>, 86 Rev. Jur. UPR 754 (2017).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/15.-Jurisprudencia-del-Tribunal-Supremo-de-los-Estados-Unidos_86-REV-JUR-UPR-754FINAL.pdf\">Enlace PDF (+)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s, 86 Rev. Jur. UPR 754 (2017). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2634","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-volumen-86-num-2"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2634"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2634\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}