{"id":2667,"date":"2017-07-03T18:38:11","date_gmt":"2017-07-03T22:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/?p=2667"},"modified":"2017-07-03T18:38:11","modified_gmt":"2017-07-03T22:38:11","slug":"derecho-constitucional-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2017\/07\/03\/derecho-constitucional-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Derecho Constitucional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Este T\u00e9rmino fue muy variado en temas constitucionales. (1) Por medio de un caso de derecho a la lactancia en el empleo, el derecho a la intimidad adquiri\u00f3 \u201cforma operativa\u201d y se concretizo como arma de litigio constitucional. (2) Se aclar\u00f3 que el poder de nombramiento de la figura del o de la Juez(a) Presidente(a) del Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico recae en el Gobernador. (3) Ocurri\u00f3 un cambio importante en la doctrina de la legitimaci\u00f3n activa: la ausencia de legitimaci\u00f3n activa no tiene como consecuencia inmediata la desestimaci\u00f3n de la demanda por falta de jurisdicci\u00f3n. (4) En relaci\u00f3n a la doctrina de impedimento colateral por sentencia a los procesos civiles de confiscaci\u00f3n como parte del v\u00ednculo entre estos y el proceso criminal paralelo, el Tribunal se ha dividido, particularmente en cuanto la naturaleza constitucional o estatutaria de dicha doctrina. (5) Las posiciones de los jueces y juezas sobre el mandato constitucional de rehabilitaci\u00f3n de las personas convictas de delito var\u00edan entre entender que es un derecho ejecutable, hasta pensar que no debe ir por encima del derecho de las v\u00edctimas. (6) Con la expansi\u00f3n del acceso de los medios noticiosos a los procesos judiciales, hubo mucho debate entre los jueces y juezas sobre los retos que se dar\u00e1n en el contexto de procesos criminales.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">This was a varied Term in constitutional issues. (1) With a case on the right to lactation at the workplace, the right to privacy acquired an \u201coperative form\u201d and materialized itself as a constitutional litigation weapon. (2) The Court clarified that the power to appoint the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico lies within the Governor&#8217;s\u00a0constitutional powers. (3) An important change was made in the <i>standing<\/i> doctrine: absence of standing will not result in automatic dismissal of the complaint regarding want of jurisdiction. (4) In terms of collateral estoppel doctrine in civil confiscation procedure as part of its relation to a parallel criminal procedure, the Court is divided, particularly regarding the constitutional or statutory nature of said doctrine. (5) The views the judges have in relation to the constitutional rehabilitation mandate vary from understanding it as an actionable right to viewing it as of lesser importance than the victim\u2019s rights. (6) With the expansion of access to judicial procedures by the news media, a debate was held among the judges regarding the challenges it could present in the context of criminal procedures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Cita:<\/strong> Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s,\u00a0<em>Derecho Constitucional<\/em>, 86 Rev. Jur. UPR 662 (2017)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/12.-DERECHO-CONSTITUCIONAL-86-REVJURUPR-662.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enlace PDF (+)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jorge M. Farinacci Fern\u00f3s, 86 Rev. Jur. UPR 662 (2017)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2667","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-volumen-86-num-2"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}