En este art\u00edculo los autores analizan cinco casos resueltos por el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico en la materia de responsabilidad civil extracontractual durante el t\u00e9rmino de 2016-2017. Del mismo modo, explican el desarrollo y la interpretaci\u00f3n jurisprudencial de la doctrina de responsabilidad estricta de fabricantes por productos defectuosos, da\u00f1os continuados, responsabilidad del Estado por actos delictivos de terceros y acciones de impericia m\u00e9dica. Entre los casos discutidos, se presentan los siguientes: Rodr\u00edguez M\u00e9ndez v. Laser Eye 195 DPR\u00a0 769 (2016), Rivera Ru\u00edz v.\u00a0 Mun. de Ponce 196 DPR 410 (2016), SLG Col\u00f3n-Rivas v. ELA 196 DPR 855 (2016), Vel\u00e1zquez Ortiz v. Mun. de Humacao 197 DPR 656 (2017), Rodr\u00edguez Figueroa v. Centro de Salud Mario Canales Torresola 197 DPR 876 (2017).<\/p>\n
In this article, the authors analyze and discuss five cases resolved by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico in the matter of torts and civil liability for the term of 2016-2017. In the same way, they explain the development and the jurisprudential interpretation of the doctrine of strict liability of manufacturers for defective products, continued damages, responsibility of the State for third party criminal acts, as well as medical malpractice actions. Among the cases discussed, the following are presented: Rodr\u00edguez M\u00e9ndez v. Laser Eye 195 DPR 769 (2016), Rivera Ru\u00edz v. Mun. of Ponce 196 DPR 410 (2016), SLG Col\u00f3n-Rivas v. ELA 196 DPR 855 (2016), Vel\u00e1zquez Ortiz v. Mun. of Humacao 197 DPR 656 (2017), Rodr\u00edguez Figueroa v. Mario Canales Torresola Health Center 197 DPR 876 (2017).<\/p>\n
Cita:\u00a0<\/strong>Jos\u00e9 Juli\u00e1n \u00c1lvarez Gonz\u00e1lez & Jos\u00e9 Javier Col\u00f3n Garc\u00eda,\u00a0Responsabilidad Civil Extracontractual<\/em>, 87 Rev. Jur. UPR 601 (2018).<\/p>\n