{"id":3430,"date":"2018-06-15T00:30:51","date_gmt":"2018-06-15T04:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/?p=3430"},"modified":"2018-06-15T00:30:51","modified_gmt":"2018-06-15T04:30:51","slug":"obligaciones-y-contratos-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2018\/06\/15\/obligaciones-y-contratos-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Obligaciones y Contratos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Cita:<\/strong>\u00a0Juan J. Hern\u00e1ndez L\u00f3pez de Victoria,<em>\u00a0Obligaciones y Contratos<\/em>, 87 Rev. Jur. UPR 575 (2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">El profesor Juan J. Hern\u00e1ndez L\u00f3pez de Victoria analiza los pronunciamientos sobre Obligaciones y Contratos emitidos por el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico entre el 1 de julio de 2016 y el 30 de junio de 2017. A pesar de que la mayor\u00eda de estas decisiones reafirmaron los precedentes existentes, el Profesor expone con claridad los elementos que pesaron en el \u00e1nimo del Tribunal y cuestiona los fundamentos de ciertas conclusiones legales. Las decisiones rese\u00f1adas abarcan temas tan variados como: (1) la Ley N\u00fam. 75 de Contratos de Distribuci\u00f3n de 1964 y el injunction que su art\u00edculo 3-A misma permite; (2) las cl\u00e1usulas de no competencia en el contexto de miembros (que son, a su vez, empleados) de una corporaci\u00f3n de servicios profesionales; (3) la ilegalidad o validez de la causa en un contrato de compraventa de un veh\u00edculo de motor con gravamen de venta condicional; (4) las alegaciones necesarias en un reclamo de enga\u00f1o o fraude en la validez de la cl\u00e1usula de selecci\u00f3n de foro, y (5) la exigencia de que sea expreso un contrato de mandato en el contexto de bienes propiedad de la sociedad legal de gananciales.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Professor Juan J. Hern\u00e1ndez L\u00f3pez de Victoria analyzes Supreme Court of Puerto Rico decisions on Contracts Law issued between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. Even though most of these decisions reaffirmed existing precedents, the Professor focuses on presenting clearly the elements that influenced the Court\u2019s reasoning and questions whether certain of their legal conclusions were sound. The decisions discussed cover topics as varied as: (1) Law No. 75 of Distribution Agreements of 1964 and the injunction that its article 3-A allows; (2) non-compete clauses in the context of members (that are also employees) of a professional services corporation; (3) the illegality or validity of consideration in a contract for the sale of a motor vehicle with a conditional sale lien; (4) the allegations required in a claim of deception or fraud when attacking the validity of a forum selection clause, and (5) the requirement that an agency contract be expressed in the context of property owned by the conjugal partnership. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/11-Obligaciones-y-contratos-1.pdf\">Enlace PDF (+)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Juan J. Hern\u00e1ndez L\u00f3pez de Victoria, 87 Rev. Jur. UPR 575 (2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3430","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-revista87-num2"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}