{"id":652,"date":"2016-05-17T20:11:28","date_gmt":"2016-05-17T20:11:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp\/?p=652"},"modified":"2016-05-17T20:11:28","modified_gmt":"2016-05-17T20:11:28","slug":"un-grito-en-la-noche-el-canon-38-es-innecesario-y-redundante-algunas-dificultades-con-su-aplicacion-ex-proprio-vigore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/2016\/05\/17\/un-grito-en-la-noche-el-canon-38-es-innecesario-y-redundante-algunas-dificultades-con-su-aplicacion-ex-proprio-vigore\/","title":{"rendered":"Un grito en la noche: algunas dificultades del Canon 38 al aplicarse ex proprio vigore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El juez apelativo Figueroa Cab\u00e1n examina algunas de las dificultades que plantea la aplicaci\u00f3n ex proprio vigore del canon 38 del C\u00f3digo de \u00c9tica Profesional a partir de In re Gordon Men\u00e9ndez y su progenie. Su an\u00e1lisis consiste en estudiar el desarrollo hist\u00f3rico, jur\u00eddico y jurisprudencial del canon 9 del C\u00f3digo Modelo de la American Bar Association y el canon 38 de los C\u00e1nones de \u00c9tica Profesional de Puerto Rico. El Juez identifica las consecuencias adversas de la interpretaci\u00f3n ex proprio vigore del canon 38, entre ellas la falta notificaci\u00f3n adecuada de la conducta proscrita y la privaci\u00f3n de la propiedad del abogado sin el debido proceso de ley, y se apoya en ellas para recomendar la eliminaci\u00f3n de dicha norma disciplinaria.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cita:<\/strong> F\u00e9lix R. Figueroa Cab\u00e1n, <em>Un grito en la noche: algunas dificultades del Canon 38 al aplicarse ex proprio vigore<\/em>,\u00a085 Rev. Jur. UPR 311 (2016).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/revistajuridica.uprrp.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/85-Rev.-Jur.-UPR-311-2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enlace PDF (+)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>F\u00e9lix R. Figueroa Cab\u00e1n, 85 Rev. Jur. UPR 311 (2016).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54,74],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-652","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-rev-85","7":"category-rev85-num1"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/derecho.uprrp.edu\/revistajuridica\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}